Okay. I put myself to bed yesterday... and today, I feel better but not well. There it is. You know, that dangerous borderland territory where what one needs to do is remain in bed, but what one wants to do is get up and go!
So, I channeled what energy I have and watched
the video of the PB and Bishop Sauls beginning the conversation about changing the church. Here is what I took away--
1) yes, we must A) reform governance B) re-invent local mission.
2) the idea of shared resources is all great and good. BUT, that would mean, for example that the congregations that struggle to pay for a full or even part-time priest --where the salary and benefits of the priest take about 2/3rds of the budget or more, would have to share a priest --well, that is going to be a tough one to pull off. [At my previous cure, we tried to get a shared youth group going, share a sexton, share a program/education staff --we even had conversations about sharing a priest --and it was roadblocked every step of the way. No, each congregation wanted each to their own even if it meant doing without. I cannot see it happening without a mandate. We should also think of ways to reduce/eliminate our utility costs in our grand over-sized and under-stuffed church buildings...]
3) local mission is all well and good, but too often local mission becomes the pet projects of particular folks... and it will potentially end in creating a duplication of resources which all this "conversation" is intending to undo.
4) in suggesting that GC meet less frequently to save money... well, fewer meetings doesn't promote better governance or better conversation. And, fewer representatives doesn't bode well for minority representation... this needs to be thought through more carefully. And in suggesting that legislation or resolutions come only through Dioceses or some other institutional group would be deadly. Just not how The Spirit usually works.... And talk about squashing minority voices.... This one is a tough one...
I suggest that every member of this church be required to read and then re-read
What Every Church Member Should Know About Poverty so that we can see how rife with assumptions-- even our language, much less our structures, and how we "do" mission is --it is loaded. And self-serving.
I suggest that every clergy person (EVERY clergy person) be willing to take half the pay they do now. As a sign. And give what they would have had to local mission.... I suggest that every church that spends more than 65% of its budget on salaries be required to share personnel resources --including sharing clergy and every other salary line item.
I suggest that Bishops give up meeting in person so often --what's good for the goose etc.... And give what they would have paid otherwise to local mission.... And what meetings there are, should come out of their own pockets.... I suggest that Bishops conform to their own Diocesan scale of suggested pay for priests --you know, how many years of service = X amount of $$$$. I know of only one Bishop that does this.
I suggest that all meetings come out of vacation, holiday or time off --especially those who work for the church. This would put church-working clergy on a parity with laity who choose to do this work. And, I think it would dramatically reform how we do meetings.
I suggest that there be true parity in pension benefits between lay and clergy. I suggest that the medical benefits between dioceses be the same (in Virginia, the medical insurance costs about $450/month --in South Dakota it is $1,100 and we have to pay 15% the cost plus deductibles). I suggest that medical insurance be open to all church workers and all laity who might choose to participate. Perhaps we should do that with pension programs as well....
I suggest we stop supporting Church Publishing and make everything available on-line. Without copyright. And what we do end up publishing should be in paperback and affordable to all.
We should be very, very wary of using the word 'mission' --it has the same history of the crusades and 'mission' has been very damaging in so many places....
I suggest that those who are already critical of the conversation begun by the PB and Sauls start making suggestions --which is far more difficult and can in turn be gone over critically with a fine tooth comb.... We must.
We must.
From prayer this morning (from Genesis 27--I think!)
This is none other than the house of God, and this is the gate of heaven.
We should do everything we can to make the church itself the image of the Kingdom, the gate of heaven. We should make the church itself a sign of what we believe. Not practical? What else should we be doing? Anything else is the worship of the idol of institutionalism.
We must.